I love the red lantern series.

Posted by: Smee on 5/15/2013 2:01:51 PM

I was looking forward to it, especially after the wrap-up to War of the GL's/ Brghtest Day fallout. Should be interesting... I wasn't completely blown away, but I wasn't disappointed, either.

Posted by: MEsch on 9/21/2011 10:40:04 AM

personally i found the red lantern first promising, but itself not great. it set up for the story arc REALLY well, although im disappointed not to see a static shock review, as someone who watched the show as a kid, remembers just about every episode, and who would gladly join a cult if the founder was named virgil hawkins (a joke), i found the #1 to be AMAZING and it brought back all my happy memories of static shock

Posted by: sparkdemon on 9/21/2011 10:13:23 AM

@xlaw22: Well, that's a pretty unconstructive post. 'Libid' is not a word, but 'libido' is, and it's what he mention to type. One letter threw you off entirely to what he was saying? And I'm not even sure which sentence you find confounding, the paragraph is a brief synopsis of the comic. Starts with Dex-Starr, doing the Red Lantern thing, then ends with Atrocitous remembering why he started the corps. Pretty straightforward. I think it's great I can swing by this site and read articles related to things we all probably enjoy. I know you can find dozens of reviews elsewhere, but these are here and written by fellow players. That makes us a community, and we should all be supportive. It's also kind of like one stop shopping. So don't be harsh, ask for clarification.

Furthermore, I enjoyed the article. I enjoy the Lanterns, but wasn't super excited about the Rage of the Red Lanterns arc, but this has made me consider giving them a closer look.

Posted by: mbZero on 9/20/2011 9:08:17 AM

proofreading is a must. I'm not sure what that last paragraph is trying to say... libid is not a word and sentence six is completely perplexing.

Posted by: xlaw22 on 9/20/2011 4:43:06 AM